
Some comments posted on this blog on Monday set me to thinking about how better to manage large public tastings. Speaking specifically about last Sunday’s Taste Washington event, one person wrote:
“Upon leaving, it looked like Mardi Gras, Rock Festivals of old. Not pretty seeing more than four different groups in various corners puking their guts out. Too much of a good thing?”
A second chimed in “I was hoping that the industry would be pushing moderation at Taste WA this year, but here are two examples where it didn't seem to be going that way.
#1 - Got a pour from Rotie Cellars that filled my glass more than half full.
#2 - I was spitting religiously (and it was nice that there were paper spit cups available) and was told by a staff member (don't remember which booth) as I poured out a full spit cup that "you sure are wasting a lot of wine".
I put up a question on my Facebook page asking for more feedback (I did not attend Taste WA this year so I have no first-hand impressions). Out of the dozens and dozens of comments, no real consensus emerged. It seems like a clear case of the committee of blind persons describing the elephant. Depending upon where you were pouring, who you were with, what you happened to do and when you did it, you may have concluded that it was the best Taste WA ever, or you quite possibly left early because it was too much of a drinking party and you wanted no part of it.









